Vukovic's brain snap and the coming of Renaudinho

By Half Time Orange - Jesse Fink | 25 February 2008 | 09:17

The prospect of Central Coast Mariners goalkeeper Danny Vukovic facing a potential lifetime ban from football for allegedly manhandling referee Mark Shield in the final minutes of Sunday’s A-League Grand Final is firstly outrageous and secondly a tragedy of epic proportions for the future of the game in this country.

 

The kid is our next Socceroos No. 1 and a fierce competitor. If he touched Shield in any way, he's an idiot, but not a criminal.

Vukovic was right to be spitting chips that James Holland's blatant last-gasp handball in the box wasn't picked up by any of the match officials. It was pretty bloody obvious.

You would expect a whistleblower of Shield's supposed standing in the international game to sniff out these sorts of goalmouth transgressions like Robert Parker does an inferior shiraz, but in the biggest game of the year, at the very climax of the game, he failed. It was a career killer.

The problem, as I see it, is the wrong career is getting cut short.

The best move Football Federation Australia could make is to petition FIFA to relax its opposition to video referees adjudicating on such contentious moments. Video replays work in rugby league, they are used judiciously in cricket, and in football, where more muggings go on during corner kicks than your typical Saturday night in Naples, they are sorely needed.

Simply saying we need better assistant referees or referees is a cop-out.

Human beings, no matter how highly trained or visually acute, are unreliable. A strategically placed camera is less so. You can be assured defenders the world over would change their modus operandi (well-timed scrotum squeezes, sly punches) if they knew they were being properly watched.

So a hollow sort of victory to the Newcastle Jets, and I say that as a long-time Jets fan. They were comfortably the better team on the day and deserved to win, and I still think Ante Covic, as in-form as he is, could have stopped John Aloisi's penalty - that's assuming the poor bloke can still kick straight.

But the end of the match tarnished the result and this will be one championship that Mariners fans will rightly feel was robbed from them.

Also of interest to Half-Time Orange this week was Houston Dynamo's hellfire shellacking of Sydney FC in the inaugural Pan-Pacific Championship in Hawaii.

I'm always curious to see how any Australian club fares in international competition, be it the FIFA Club World Cup or the Asian Champions League or whatever, yet sadly all we learned from this sorry escapade is Pim Verbeek was probably right to dump on the A-League after all.

Over at FourFourTwo, reporter Aidan Ormond, compiling a minute-by-minute match log at the crime scene in Honolulu, was moved to call it "dismal" and an "inept ordeal".

After 45 minutes he typed with paternal frustration: "The 3-0 scoreline is an accurate reflection of an appalling first half from Sydney - the worst I've seen. In front of a whole lot of international journalists, we look like amateurs."

What made the final result infinitely more embarrassing, however, was John Kosmina's whimpering and comical comment after the match that his team had been undone by a "long season"; this after he'd told the press earlier in the week that "we're not here for a holiday".

How this man was given a two-year contract by the Sydney FC board before he'd failed to get the club to the Grand Final still defies rational explanation. He not only failed to get them there but, as we saw against Queensland Roar in the finals, got them playing like donkeys.

I caught Sydney's second match in the PPC after the A-League Grand Final and it must have been an improvement of sorts, as they managed to actually score a goal, a screamer off the boot of renowned target man (cough) Brendan Renaud, a 34-year-old journeyman full-back who was Sydney's most incisive attacking option all night at the Aloha Stadium.

Who needs Juninho when you've got Renaudinho?

Speaking of the Little Fella, I had the pleasure of briefly meeting him last week and he was hardly blown away by Sydney's determination to hang on to him. He's moved out of his house in the inner west and decamped back to Brazil to await word of Sydney's final offer, which, if it comes, is expected to be well below his asking price this season.

Juninho is desperate to stay in Australia but equally isn't going to sell himself short. He's ruled out moving to an Asian league for family reasons and is most likely to return permanently to Brazil if Sydney doesn't table a decent offer.

The stats say he played 15 times for Sydney in "Version 3.0" and for a million bucks some accountants will count that as a poor return, but as far as I'm concerned he's been the club's standout player every time he's got on the pitch.

If Juninho goes, he'll be a huge loss to the A-League. World Cup winners don't come along every day. And who's going to slot those magic through-balls for Alex Brosque to stuff up?

Renaudinho, don't retire… a playmaker vacancy might just be opening up.

Join the Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.


Your Comments

16 Apr 2008 11:18 AEST

mark

From: bris

it was a high five for goodness sake let him play in the olympics just not the aleague its not that good anyway he should leave it

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)

05 Apr 2008 12:46 AEST

Peter Tripoli

From: Perth

I think everyone overlooks one thing. There is no such thing as "handball" (except in AFL) and the word does not appear in the Laws of the Game. A free kick is awarded if in the oppinion of the referee a player "deliberately handles the ball". Unlike other free kicks, if the handling of the ball is not deliberate, it is not an offence, irrispective of the outcome. Only Mark Shield knows if he saw the incident (or incidents) and whether he considered it deliberate or not.

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)

23 Mar 2008 21:41 AEST

Jared

From: Byron Bay

i think the Referees in this country have a lot to answer for, Not seeing that handball in the final when you have your own eyes and TWO others is rediculus i just think maybe Sheild just didnt have the guts to give a penalty or maybe ALL 3 Pair s of eyes missed it? when thousands of fans saw it. NO WONDER VUKOVIC BLEW UP, if James Holland does not touch that ball you can clearly see it is heading directly at Vukovic's foot.

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)

12 Mar 2008 8:54 AEST

nh

From: sydney

vukovic got wat he deserved, but some1 lik kewel wouldnt hav been treated the same way if he touched the ref - double standards. pls comment back

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)

06 Mar 2008 22:54 AEST

fannatix

From: sydney

After all that's been said and seen, I still feel young Vuka was simply used as an example for all players. He is only 23 and has (obviously) very little friends on influence in FFA, hence a perfect target. I am disgusted with the way that FFA dealt with the whole Grand Final, including the bemusing display of accountant royals on the GF day who appear to be leading this league. You may choose to forget about him but to me his raw emotion still meant much more than any record sales of TV rights!

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)

05 Mar 2008 20:37 AEST

BG

From: Adelaide

Yep. Can definitely see Petrovski tap the ref's arm a fraction of a second before Vukovic. That gentle caress has got to be worth at least 9 months (3 suspended)

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)

03 Mar 2008 13:07 AEST

Jasper

From: Earth

Looking back at the replays you can clearly see Petrovski backhand the ref right before Vukovic does. Now why hasn't anything been done about this incident? The FFA are setting double standards, as no player should be allowed to touch the ref under any circumstances.

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)

02 Mar 2008 22:29 AEST

Alex

From: Adelaide

Vukovic should be punished, the bottom line is that you cant touch referees, thats it! True Grifiths should have being more severaly punished and there should be more consistency with in the A-league referees. As for the final it was a poor display of football and shows that the A-leauge cant only go up, it is encouraging that good football one the day instead of the brut force of the ccm.

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)

01 Mar 2008 13:28 AEST

Ahmed

From: Brisbane

RENAUDINHO.......you not serious. If you adding Dinho to his name you got be kidding me. The bloke cant cement a place in the Sydney FC team, how do you bestow such a name on him. Seriously, Verbeek is right, our standard is relly low if this is how we bestow names. As for Vukovic, you not serious again. That was a high 5. If joel griffiths is not punished, then vukovic should not have been either.

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)

29 Feb 2008 23:35 AEST

Steve

From: NSW

I agree that: -Jedinak fingertipped the ball before holland. video replay bears this out. -CCM should follow coach's lead

I agree (0 agree) I disagree (0 disagree)